A men's organisation has to be set up for the following reasons, regarding the emotional turmoil that goes on as he sees a woman with provocative clothes, the helplessness of him in any incident for that matter that involves woman, it might be family issue, or a road incidence or any incidence outside, like how he will be targeted, handling of a situation by people of the same incidence done by girl /boy, about discrimination done to a boy. Are men's mind in disease from time immemorial? Does it needs a treatment at least now? Or, is it the biological indications of the health of men, when he sees a provocative incident. Here comes the need of a proper definition of clothes/dress at the earliest. Woman organisations say that, let they wear any kind of clothes, its woman's wish. Why men should look and think and do all sorts of nonsense, why can't they control or train their sons by parents to not to think or do anything harmful.
On the other hand why can't men do what ever they want when they see a provocative woman, its men's wish. Here a question rises, Anyone can do watever they want provided it should not harm others, here they are referring to the harm caused to a woman by men. In the same way the emotions hurt not only once but N No. of repeated hits in the minds of men which forces a man to do such a heinous act in the eyes of society, which in the minds of men is nothing but to do wat they wanted to do, like women what they wanted to wear. Men's organisation should shout the slogans saying that their act on woman is justified until the turmoil of provocation is removed from the minds of them. If doing a heinous act is a disease on men's part, then wearing a provactive dress even though she is capable of purchasing a full good non revealing clothes is possible from her side, is also a disease. If those types are wore in the name of variety then doing the so called heinous act by men is also a kind of variety on men's part.
Men are naturally attracted to feminine counterparts, if there are some variations in waves which women are also a part of it leads to chaos in society in larger perspective. Another new set of flow of thoughts come from the so called Women protectionists that, everything is in the eyes and the minds of a person. If that is the case, then consider a movies with a item song, the very reason for the song is to have a different kind of fun by the viewers, what is that diferent?. Till then was it not the entertainment?. Yes it was, but how is this entertainment different from that of the other one which you got even after seeing the sacred love seen (in broader sense) of Hero and Heroin. The other one what i talked was a passionate thing. So here comes a question how are the audience able to distinguish between them, the answer is simple just by looking and using their own minds, and all are coming to a conclusion that one is Sattvic or the sacred one, the other is passionate, no viewer irrespective of he/she with getting themselves fooled come to the conclusions respectively, likewise in the real world, let us not get fooled by telling ourselves that a passionate looking creature is sattvic in nature. In addition to this why the schools run by different organisations all over unanimously agree to have a Uniform, what you wear is a his/her choice why to force to have a uniform, the reasons might be to avoid differentiation among students which may finally create a unhealthy atmosphere, similarly if people in general if they wear something unacceptable, it may spoil the atmosphere of the society.
However in our brain, every portion has got its contribution for different activities, if it is triggered, it will do its job, one basic funda which every individual has to understand that His brain is different from her brain, means, it includes not only emotional but physical also. MEN ARE EQUALLY EMOTIONAL, BUT THE WAY OF EXPRESSION IS DIFFERENT THAN WOMAN. Its high time to make these self analysis by all so that new healthy society can be developed. Recently there was a big haul after the release of verdict by Supreme court regarding the judgement of LGBT.
The ill reputed jnana peeti (GK) was also present in the show off campaign only to cater to his name and fame, with no proper mind in it. one of the slogans read controlling of senses by saints is also unnatural, which was more or less a kind of reply to the statement, the act of love (so called) by same sex is unnatural.In that case,according to them, anything which is awakening instantaneously and spontaneously is natural, then The birth of awakening of senses or love (lust) in the minds of a rapist should be natural according to their own definition, which he/she if enforced, should be accepted whether willingly or unwillingly and should not be branded as a crime. If you now say that controlling of senses is required you don't have any moral rights to say that, because, you only agreed that anything natural if controlled will be unnatural. If you say controlling is required the saint according to you saint is a sinister on himself.
Mind is the root cause of all actions. It is on the minds on which the target is made on men (emotional) which after long tug of war of control some men fail and tries to turn or forced to turn their emotional fantasies to realities. In this long journey, who has gone physical on whom and who has gone mental/emotional whom? Very difficult to answer. The superficial answer turns into the favour of women. Now lets analyse in a different angle, can't a man/woman have control on their sexual desires? S they can but not all. No normal/common man cannot turn his eyes around whenever there is a provocative seductress, let her be like that, there willingly or unwillingly. (Here i'm also talking about a ugly woman with the dressing what she had put on her). Let the man there be innocent and Noble. Only people of higher order can do that, who are called saints who have their interests and tastes in a higher platform (not in Muladhara and Swadhishtna but in Sahasraara), So finally telling not all are saints and cannot be. all are not saints.
Govts role. A responsible Govt. should consider the views of Woman wing and Men's wing, and should frame suitable laws amicably and should warn them of consequences if the barrier is exceeded. As of now, the actual victims or the Poor prey's are innocent women (even dressed properly) and children who undergo molestation, who don't know what is right and wrong as they are the easy targets for the people, the same people who are the victims of so called varieties, who are unable to quench their desires with the very same variety woman who wear provocative clothes, find the alternates in these poor innocents. Finally the society is already affected with the so called variety clothes. What is the purpose of marriage. The purpose of marriage is to continue the humanity and society in a good way, to which St Valentine struggled and died on Feb 14, for which we require a man and a woman should lead a life happily be getting children. Which is the more natural way of life than any of the so called posters of freedom of love(lust), Love(lust) knows no genders etc. from whom we can't expect the dreams of St.Valentine into reality. The reason for it is think that there are only marriages of like sex how will you be get children?. If there are no children, how is it that Society and Socialism can achieved. The propagators of so called socialism and free sex on mutual consent (communists) should think of it. Because the thing what they are supporting is not a natural thing but unnatural! Kindly give a review on it. If yo are not happy you can pass on whats there in mind. Its only a thought which can be brought into reality, and the purpose of which is to badger the pride of misguided woman who are ahead in the wrong direction of freedom and liberty and nothing more than that.
On the other hand why can't men do what ever they want when they see a provocative woman, its men's wish. Here a question rises, Anyone can do watever they want provided it should not harm others, here they are referring to the harm caused to a woman by men. In the same way the emotions hurt not only once but N No. of repeated hits in the minds of men which forces a man to do such a heinous act in the eyes of society, which in the minds of men is nothing but to do wat they wanted to do, like women what they wanted to wear. Men's organisation should shout the slogans saying that their act on woman is justified until the turmoil of provocation is removed from the minds of them. If doing a heinous act is a disease on men's part, then wearing a provactive dress even though she is capable of purchasing a full good non revealing clothes is possible from her side, is also a disease. If those types are wore in the name of variety then doing the so called heinous act by men is also a kind of variety on men's part.
Men are naturally attracted to feminine counterparts, if there are some variations in waves which women are also a part of it leads to chaos in society in larger perspective. Another new set of flow of thoughts come from the so called Women protectionists that, everything is in the eyes and the minds of a person. If that is the case, then consider a movies with a item song, the very reason for the song is to have a different kind of fun by the viewers, what is that diferent?. Till then was it not the entertainment?. Yes it was, but how is this entertainment different from that of the other one which you got even after seeing the sacred love seen (in broader sense) of Hero and Heroin. The other one what i talked was a passionate thing. So here comes a question how are the audience able to distinguish between them, the answer is simple just by looking and using their own minds, and all are coming to a conclusion that one is Sattvic or the sacred one, the other is passionate, no viewer irrespective of he/she with getting themselves fooled come to the conclusions respectively, likewise in the real world, let us not get fooled by telling ourselves that a passionate looking creature is sattvic in nature. In addition to this why the schools run by different organisations all over unanimously agree to have a Uniform, what you wear is a his/her choice why to force to have a uniform, the reasons might be to avoid differentiation among students which may finally create a unhealthy atmosphere, similarly if people in general if they wear something unacceptable, it may spoil the atmosphere of the society.
However in our brain, every portion has got its contribution for different activities, if it is triggered, it will do its job, one basic funda which every individual has to understand that His brain is different from her brain, means, it includes not only emotional but physical also. MEN ARE EQUALLY EMOTIONAL, BUT THE WAY OF EXPRESSION IS DIFFERENT THAN WOMAN. Its high time to make these self analysis by all so that new healthy society can be developed. Recently there was a big haul after the release of verdict by Supreme court regarding the judgement of LGBT.
The ill reputed jnana peeti (GK) was also present in the show off campaign only to cater to his name and fame, with no proper mind in it. one of the slogans read controlling of senses by saints is also unnatural, which was more or less a kind of reply to the statement, the act of love (so called) by same sex is unnatural.In that case,according to them, anything which is awakening instantaneously and spontaneously is natural, then The birth of awakening of senses or love (lust) in the minds of a rapist should be natural according to their own definition, which he/she if enforced, should be accepted whether willingly or unwillingly and should not be branded as a crime. If you now say that controlling of senses is required you don't have any moral rights to say that, because, you only agreed that anything natural if controlled will be unnatural. If you say controlling is required the saint according to you saint is a sinister on himself.
Mind is the root cause of all actions. It is on the minds on which the target is made on men (emotional) which after long tug of war of control some men fail and tries to turn or forced to turn their emotional fantasies to realities. In this long journey, who has gone physical on whom and who has gone mental/emotional whom? Very difficult to answer. The superficial answer turns into the favour of women. Now lets analyse in a different angle, can't a man/woman have control on their sexual desires? S they can but not all. No normal/common man cannot turn his eyes around whenever there is a provocative seductress, let her be like that, there willingly or unwillingly. (Here i'm also talking about a ugly woman with the dressing what she had put on her). Let the man there be innocent and Noble. Only people of higher order can do that, who are called saints who have their interests and tastes in a higher platform (not in Muladhara and Swadhishtna but in Sahasraara), So finally telling not all are saints and cannot be. all are not saints.
Govts role. A responsible Govt. should consider the views of Woman wing and Men's wing, and should frame suitable laws amicably and should warn them of consequences if the barrier is exceeded. As of now, the actual victims or the Poor prey's are innocent women (even dressed properly) and children who undergo molestation, who don't know what is right and wrong as they are the easy targets for the people, the same people who are the victims of so called varieties, who are unable to quench their desires with the very same variety woman who wear provocative clothes, find the alternates in these poor innocents. Finally the society is already affected with the so called variety clothes. What is the purpose of marriage. The purpose of marriage is to continue the humanity and society in a good way, to which St Valentine struggled and died on Feb 14, for which we require a man and a woman should lead a life happily be getting children. Which is the more natural way of life than any of the so called posters of freedom of love(lust), Love(lust) knows no genders etc. from whom we can't expect the dreams of St.Valentine into reality. The reason for it is think that there are only marriages of like sex how will you be get children?. If there are no children, how is it that Society and Socialism can achieved. The propagators of so called socialism and free sex on mutual consent (communists) should think of it. Because the thing what they are supporting is not a natural thing but unnatural! Kindly give a review on it. If yo are not happy you can pass on whats there in mind. Its only a thought which can be brought into reality, and the purpose of which is to badger the pride of misguided woman who are ahead in the wrong direction of freedom and liberty and nothing more than that.
No comments:
Post a Comment